← every election

First serious two-front challenge: Semangat 46 with Gagasan Rakyat and APU.

21 October 1990180 seats91 for a majority

“Alliance/BN” held 127 of 180 seats — past the 91 needed to govern.

Alliance/BN127
PR/PH28
Other18
PAS-led7

No seat map before 2008. The chamber above is from a checked historical table.

The road here

Parliament was dissolved on 5 October, setting a ten-day campaign before polling on 20–21 October. The short timetable had been widely expected; the Commonwealth Observer Group said the government and Election Commission presented it as a security precaution, while some political parties told the group it disadvantaged them.

The election followed the UMNO split of the late 1980s and the formation of Semangat ’46. Retrospective scholarship identifies 1990 as one of the occasions when a split among ruling-party elites coincided with unusually broad opposition cooperation.

Semangat ’46 worked in two electoral fronts: Angkatan Perpaduan Ummah with PAS, BERJASA and HAMIM, and Gagasan Rakyat with DAP and PBS. PBS’s departure from BN on 15 October added to the late-campaign realignment.

The major campaigns presented contrasting messages: BN stressed continuity, while its opponents called for changed leadership and a different national economic and social direction. The observer report also recorded a campaign environment in which only licensed indoor meetings were permitted and in which opposition parties raised concerns about media access and other rules.

BN retained government with 127 of the 180 seats. The gap between votes and seats is the number to hold on to: 53.4 per cent of the vote returned 70.6 per cent of the chamber, and the two opposition blocs, on 21.6 and 21.1 per cent of the vote, took 15 and 34 seats between them. Under Malaysia's first-past-the-post system a party wins a seat by finishing first in it, so a vote share spread efficiently across many constituencies converts into a larger share of seats than of votes.

Compared with 1986, retrospective scholarship records a larger opposition parliamentary presence, although BN retained its two-thirds majority. Mahathir then began a third term as Prime Minister.

The Commonwealth observers' own summing-up at the close of the poll ran both ways. They concluded that the nomination proceedings and the organisation and conduct of polling had been properly and impartially carried out, and that to that extent voters had been able to express their choice freely under Malaysian law; and they said they would record serious concern about inaccuracies in the electoral rolls and about unequal opposition access to the mainstream media, especially television.

What the sources say

Parliament was dissolved on 5 October 1990; polling was held on 20–21 October for all 180 Dewan Rakyat seats.

Commonwealth Observer Group

The campaign lasted ten days. BN’s manifesto emphasised continuity and its record in office, while the opposition manifesto called for a change of political leadership and national economic and social direction.

Commonwealth Observer Group

Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS) left BN on 15 October and allied with the opposition. The observer report described the election as distinctive for the emergence of a broadly based opposition coalition.

Commonwealth Observer Group

The Commonwealth Observer Group recorded that restrictions rooted in the post-1969 legal framework limited campaigning to police-permitted indoor ceramah and described the campaign as orderly and peaceful but controlled.

Commonwealth Observer Group

BN won 127 seats and retained the two-thirds parliamentary majority; Mahathir Mohamad was sworn in for a third term, and the cabinet composition was announced on 26 October.

Inter-Parliamentary Union

BN won 127 of the 180 Dewan Rakyat seats — 70.6 per cent of the chamber — with 2,985,382 votes, or 53.4 per cent of the 5,593,217 votes counted for parties. Just over half the vote therefore returned just over seven in ten seats. The Angkatan Perpaduan Ummah bloc took 21.6 per cent of the vote and 15 seats; the Gagasan Rakyat bloc took 21.1 per cent and 34 seats; candidates outside any coalition took 3.9 per cent and 4 seats.

ElectionData.MY

Retrospectively, political scientist Muhamad M. N. Nadzri recorded the same relationship from the seat side: he wrote that the ruling coalition's share of parliamentary seats fell from 83.61 per cent in 1986 to 70.5 per cent in 1990 — leaving opposition representation at roughly 16 per cent and then roughly 30 per cent — while BN retained its two-thirds majority. He attributes those figures to Abdul Aziz (1999).

Muhamad M. N. Nadzri

The Commonwealth Observer Group's closing statement to the Commonwealth Secretary-General, issued at the close of the poll, concluded that the nomination proceedings and the organisation and conduct of polling were “properly and impartially carried out”, and that to that extent the elections let voters express their choice freely in accordance with Malaysian law. The same statement said the group would also record serious concern about inaccuracies in the electoral rolls — defects it said the Election Commission acknowledged to it, along with recommendations it had made to correct them — and about unequal opposition access to mainstream media, especially television.

Commonwealth Observer Group

Why, and who says so

Explanations for a result are arguments, not facts.

Whether campaign conditions materially shaped the result

The Commonwealth Observer Group recorded opposition complaints about unequal media access, restrictions on campaign meetings and postal-ballot practices; it did not investigate or determine the validity of each allegation.. The Malaysian government later argued that some observer criticisms, including those concerning media bias, were inaccurate because the group had assessed only English-language newspapers.

Commonwealth Observer GroupMuhamad Takiyuddin Ismail and Norazam Mohd Noor

the position put by the Election Commission and the Government : both told the Observer Group that the short campaign period was deliberate and taken for security reasons, because prolonged political activity at earlier elections had generated tension and unrest, and both emphasised their concern to minimise the risk of a recurrence. The group also recorded that the campaign restrictions were accepted by most of the Malaysians it spoke to as necessary deterrents to activity that might lead to communal violence, and that it was assured on all sides that the police had been liberal in enforcing the rules on indoor ceramah. It recorded the opposite view alongside: some political parties told it the campaign period should be longer, and it was put to the group on several occasions — and made a plank of the opposition manifesto — that the restrictions had outlived their usefulness.

Commonwealth Observer Group

advanced by political scientist Khong Kim Hoong : he argued that use of state bureaucracy and facilities, including control of mass media and access to financial resources, enabled BN to communicate its message more effectively than the opposition.

Khong Kim Hoong

advanced by political scientist Muhamad M. N. Nadzri : he described the opposition as requiring two separate coalitions because of differences between Islamic-based parties and non-Malay parties, and linked BN’s continuing victories to opposition ideological division and weaker organisation.

Muhamad M. N. Nadzri

advanced by the BN government’s campaign framing : the government highlighted continuing growth, foreign investment and the benefits of development, under a “peace, stability and prosperity” message.

Inter-Parliamentary Union

Promises

Manifesto ofBarisan Nasional. Government: 1990 – the 1995 federal election.
  • Likely met — the record shows the promised action itself, dated within the tenure
  • Records found — related records exist; accounts may differ or fall short of the pledge
  • None found — no record located
P1Democracy, elections and expressionNone found

Reported as point (i) of BN's 14-point manifesto: “uphold democracy in the country by continuing to allow ‘free and fair’ elections, and freedom of expression ‘as long as they did not instigate racial or religious conflicts’.” Malay original was not located; English is the wording printed by Khong.

Khong Kim Hoong

What we found

None found.

Commonwealth Observer Group

After the tenure

The next federal election was held on 24–25 April 1995, after Parliament was dissolved on 5 April.

P2Independence of the judiciaryNone found

Reported as point (ii): “uphold the independence of the judiciary.” Malay original was not located; English is the wording printed by Khong.

Khong Kim Hoong

What we found

None found.

P3Liberal, open economy, wages and employmentRecords found

Reported as point (iii): “continue with the present policy of a liberal, open economy to encourage growth, higher wages and to create employment opportunities.” Malay original was not located; English is the wording printed by Khong.

Khong Kim Hoong

What we found

On 10 July 1991 Mahathir presented the Sixth Malaysia Plan (1991–95) motion in the Dewan Rakyat. The official plan states that government would encourage the private sector to remain the main engine of growth, sustain a macroeconomic environment conducive to private investment, and continue liberalisation and regulatory relaxation to improve the investment climate. These are dated policy instruments within the tenure; the plan does not itself demonstrate a particular wage or job outcome.

National Archives of MalaysiaGovernment of Malaysia

P4Prudent financial policy and investmentRecords found

Reported as point (iv): “maintain prudent financial policies to make the country an attractive investment centre.” Malay original was not located; English is the wording printed by Khong.

Khong Kim Hoong

What we found

The Sixth Malaysia Plan, presented in Parliament on 10 July 1991, sets fiscal and monetary policy objectives of price stability, an export-supporting exchange rate, and a satisfactory balance of payments; it also says the government would strengthen revenue, reduce unproductive expenditure, and synchronise privatisation to improve public-sector finances. This is an identified policy instrument within the tenure. Whether those measures made Malaysia an “attractive investment centre” is not evaluated here.

National Archives of MalaysiaGovernment of Malaysia

P5Chinese and Tamil primary schoolsRecords found

Reported as point (v): “allow the continuation of Chinese and Tamil primary schools in their present character.” Malay original was not located; English is the wording printed by Khong.

Khong Kim Hoong

What we found

In a 18 December 1991 Dewan Rakyat answer, the Education Ministry said that, by October 1991 under the Sixth Malaysia Plan, it had spent $1.3 million specifically on Sekolah Rendah Jenis Kebangsaan (Tamil) and $1.7 million on Sekolah Rendah Jenis Kebangsaan (Cina). The Hansard records continued provision and upgrading for these school types, but it is not a complete legal test of their “present character.”

Parliament of Malaysia

After the tenure

The Education Act 1996 (Act 550) received royal assent on 15 July 1996 and was gazetted on 1 August 1996, after the GE8 tenure.

P6Islam and freedom of worshipRecords found

Reported as point (vi): “maintain Islam as the official religion of the country and at the same time guarantee the freedom of worship of other religions as stated in the constitution.” Malay original was not located; English is the wording printed by Khong.

Khong Kim Hoong

What we found

The constitutional provisions named in the promise are identifiable: Article 3(1) states that Islam is the religion of the Federation while other religions may be practised in peace and harmony, and Article 11 provides for freedom of religion subject to stated limits. I did not locate, in this pass, a citable complete legislative history establishing whether and how the government acted on this maintenance commitment during 1990–95; the present constitutional text is therefore background, not a finding of performance.

Attorney General's Chambers of Malaysia

Every promise, every election →
← GE7 (1986)GE9 (1995) →

Common questions

When was GE8 held?

GE8 was held on 20–21 October 1990, after Parliament was dissolved on 5 October. All 180 Dewan Rakyat seats were contested. The campaign lasted ten days; BN’s manifesto emphasised continuity and its record in office, and the election returned BN with 127 seats.

Commonwealth Observer GroupInter-Parliamentary Union

Who formed the government after GE8?

BN formed the government after winning 127 of the 180 Dewan Rakyat seats, retaining its two-thirds parliamentary majority. Its 127 seats represented 70.6 per cent of the chamber. Mahathir Mohamad was sworn in for a third term as Prime Minister, and the cabinet composition was announced on 26 October.

Inter-Parliamentary UnionElectionData.MY

Why did BN get more seats than its share of votes?

BN received 53.4 per cent of votes counted for parties but won 70.6 per cent of the Dewan Rakyat seats. Malaysia’s first-past-the-post system awards each seat to the candidate who finishes first in that constituency, so votes spread across many constituency wins can produce a larger share of seats than of votes.

ElectionData.MY

Why was the GE8 campaign only ten days?

The government and Election Commission said the short campaign was intended to reduce security risks, citing tension and unrest associated with prolonged political activity at earlier elections. Some political parties told the Commonwealth Observer Group that the campaign should have been longer and that the restrictions had outlived their usefulness.

Commonwealth Observer Group

What did observers say about how GE8 was run?

The Commonwealth Observer Group said nomination, polling organisation and conduct were properly and impartially carried out, allowing voters to express their choice freely under Malaysian law to that extent. It also reported serious concern about inaccuracies in electoral rolls and unequal opposition access to mainstream media, especially television.

Commonwealth Observer Group